Screener
CGGR vs PWB
Capital Group Growth ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGR costs 0.16% less per year.
- CGGR is significantly larger than PWB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGGR covers global markets; PWB covers north america.
- CGGR follows a active selection strategy; PWB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGR | PWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22.2B | $1.9B |
| Since | 2022 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | +47.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.9% | +34.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +18.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.35% | 18.57% |
| Max drawdown | -28.90% | -32.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGR and PWB
Explore further