Screener
PWB vs CGGO
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.08% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than PWB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PWB covers north america markets; CGGO covers global.
- PWB follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PWB | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $10.1B |
| Since | 2005 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.6% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +34.1% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.45 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.57% | 16.82% |
| Max drawdown | -32.36% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PWB and CGGO
Explore further