Screener
CGHM vs BNDS
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF vs Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
Key differences
Both CGHM and BNDS are fixed income ETFs. CGHM charges 0.34% a year and BNDS 0.88%. The main difference: CGHM follows a index tracking strategy; BNDS uses multi strategy.
- CGHM follows a index tracking strategy; BNDS uses multi strategy.
- CGHM costs 0.54% less per year.
- CGHM is much larger than BNDS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGHM | BNDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.1B | $70M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.82% | 7.98% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.0% | +11.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.11% | 3.50% |
| Max drawdown | -5.90% | -6.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.