Screener
CGHM vs GMUN
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF vs Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- GMUN costs 0.26% less per year.
- CGHM is significantly larger than GMUN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGHM | GMUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $10M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.80% | 3.07% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.7% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.15% | 2.33% |
| Max drawdown | -5.90% | -4.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGHM and GMUN
Explore further