Screener
CGHM vs MUB
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF vs iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Key differences
- MUB costs 0.29% less per year.
- MUB is significantly larger than CGHM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MUB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGHM | MUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $43.7B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.80% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.7% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.14% | 2.93% |
| Max drawdown | -5.90% | -13.68% |
Similar to CGHM and MUB
Explore further