Screener
CGIC vs DIEM
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF vs Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
Key differences
- DIEM costs 0.35% less per year.
- CGIC is significantly larger than DIEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGIC follows a active selection strategy; DIEM uses index tracking.
- DIEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGIC | DIEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $50M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | 2.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.5% | +55.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.05% | 18.01% |
| Max drawdown | -13.10% | -38.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGIC and DIEM
Explore further