Screener
CGIC vs GEND
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF vs Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF
Key differences
- GEND costs 0.16% less per year.
- CGIC is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGIC is classified as equity, while GEND is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CGIC follows a active selection strategy; GEND uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGIC | GEND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $4M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.4% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 10.70% |
| Max drawdown | -13.10% | -6.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGIC and GEND
Explore further