Screener
GEND vs CGDG
Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF vs Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- GEND costs 0.09% less per year.
- CGDG is significantly larger than GEND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEND is classified as alternative, while CGDG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- GEND covers north america markets; CGDG covers global.
- GEND follows a option income strategy; CGDG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| GEND | CGDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $4.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.6% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.70% | 10.69% |
| Max drawdown | -6.39% | -10.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to GEND and CGDG
Explore further