Screener
CGIC vs INEQ
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF vs Columbia International Equity Income ETF
Key differences
- INEQ costs 0.09% less per year.
- CGIC is significantly larger than INEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGIC follows a active selection strategy; INEQ uses index tracking.
- INEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGIC | INEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $80M |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | 2.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.5% | +29.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.05% | 13.63% |
| Max drawdown | -13.10% | -40.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGIC and INEQ
Explore further