Screener
CGIC vs REFA
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGIC follows a active selection strategy; REFA uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGIC | REFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | — |
| Since | 2024 | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.05% | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.10% | -11.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGIC and REFA
Explore further