Screener
CGIC vs OSEA
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF vs Harbor International Compounders ETF
Key differences
- CGIC is significantly larger than OSEA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGIC follows a active selection strategy; OSEA uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGIC | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $497M |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.4% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 15.18% |
| Max drawdown | -13.10% | -18.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGIC and OSEA
Explore further