Screener
OSEA vs CGXU
Harbor International Compounders ETF vs Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGXU is significantly larger than OSEA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OSEA follows a index tracking strategy; CGXU uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGXU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OSEA | CGXU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $497M | $5.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 4.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +34.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.3% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.30 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.18% | 19.51% |
| Max drawdown | -18.14% | -25.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OSEA and CGXU
Explore further