Screener
CGMS vs SDSI
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF vs American Century Short Duration Strategic Income ETF
Key differences
- SDSI costs 0.07% less per year.
- CGMS is significantly larger than SDSI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGMS follows a index tracking strategy; SDSI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGMS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGMS | SDSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.7B | $193M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 5.93% | 4.96% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.9% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.49% | 1.68% |
| Max drawdown | -4.08% | -1.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGMS and SDSI
Explore further