Screener
CGMS vs MUSI
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF vs American Century Multisector Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMS is significantly larger than MUSI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGMS follows a index tracking strategy; MUSI uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGMS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGMS | MUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.7B | $214M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.93% | 5.74% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.9% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.49% | 3.35% |
| Max drawdown | -4.08% | -13.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGMS and MUSI
Explore further