Screener
CGMS vs ZHOG
Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF vs F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMS is significantly larger than ZHOG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGMS follows a index tracking strategy; ZHOG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGMS | ZHOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.43% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.7B | $45M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 5.93% | 5.60% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.9% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.49% | 1.61% |
| Max drawdown | -4.08% | -3.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGMS and ZHOG
Explore further