Screener
CGMU vs BKMS
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF vs BNY Mellon Municipal Short Duration ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.08% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than BKMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGMU follows a index tracking strategy; BKMS uses active selection.
- BKMS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGMU | BKMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.8B | $438M |
| Since | 2022 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 3.35% | 2.43% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.18 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.28% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.10% | -0.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGMU and BKMS
Explore further