Screener
CGMU vs BMOP
Capital Group Municipal Income ETF vs BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.27% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than BMOP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGMU | BMOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.8B | $1.8B |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.35% | 3.12% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.18 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.28% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.10% | -2.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGMU and BMOP
Explore further