Screener
CGSD vs BNDS
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF vs Infrastructure Capital Bond Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSD costs 0.63% less per year.
- CGSD is significantly larger than BNDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGSD is classified as fixed income, while BNDS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CGSD follows a active selection strategy; BNDS uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGSD | BNDS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.88% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $60M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 7.93% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.47% | 3.60% |
| Max drawdown | -1.75% | -6.95% |
Similar to CGSD and BNDS
Explore further