Screener
CGUI vs GUMI
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF vs Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGUI is significantly larger than GUMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGUI follows a index tracking strategy; GUMI uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGUI | GUMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $246M | $38M |
| Since | 2024 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.95% | 2.81% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +3.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.74% | 1.09% |
| Max drawdown | -0.18% | -0.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGUI and GUMI
Explore further