Screener
CGW vs EFIV
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
Key differences
- EFIV costs 0.48% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, EFIV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CGW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | EFIV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2007 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 0.98% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +33.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +15.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 11.89% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -24.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and EFIV
Explore further