Screener
CGW vs XVV
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs iShares ESG Select Screened S&P 500 ETF
Key differences
- XVV costs 0.50% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, XVV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CGW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | XVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $636M |
| Since | 2007 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 0.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +29.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +14.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 12.83% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -27.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and XVV
Explore further