Screener
CGW vs PDP
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
Key differences
- CGW follows a index tracking strategy; PDP uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PDP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | PDP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.62% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 0.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +23.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 21.95% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -34.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and PDP
Explore further