Screener
CGW vs PIZ
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco Dorsey Wright Developed Markets Momentum ETF
Key differences
- CGW costs 0.22% less per year.
- CGW follows a index tracking strategy; PIZ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PIZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | PIZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $775M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 1.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +34.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +26.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +12.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 20.53% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -40.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and PIZ
Explore further