Screener
CGW vs RPV
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RPV costs 0.23% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $1.8B |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 2.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 12.76% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -50.67% |
Similar to CGW and RPV
Explore further