Screener
CGW vs RPG
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
Key differences
- RPG costs 0.23% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | RPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $1.8B |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 0.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +39.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 19.79% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -36.58% |
Similar to CGW and RPG
Explore further