Screener
CGW vs RWK
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWK costs 0.19% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RWK has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | RWK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 16.91% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -46.20% |
Similar to CGW and RWK
Explore further