Screener
CGW vs SPMO
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Key differences
- SPMO costs 0.45% less per year.
- SPMO is significantly larger than CGW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPMO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CGW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | SPMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $16.0B |
| Since | 2007 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 0.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +46.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +40.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +24.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 17.73% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -30.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and SPMO
Explore further