Screener
CGW vs SPVM
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
Key differences
- SPVM costs 0.19% less per year.
- CGW is significantly larger than SPVM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SPVM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | SPVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $120M |
| Since | 2007 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 1.95% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 11.77% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -45.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and SPVM
Explore further