Screener
CGW vs UPGR
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF
Key differences
- UPGR costs 0.23% less per year.
- CGW is significantly larger than UPGR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | UPGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $6M |
| Since | 2007 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 0.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +70.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 30.14% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -46.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and UPGR
Explore further