Screener
CGW vs PIO
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco Global Water ETF
Key differences
- CGW costs 0.17% less per year.
- CGW is significantly larger than PIO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CGW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | PIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $281M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +8.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 14.70% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -35.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and PIO
Explore further