Screener
CGW vs XJH
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- XJH costs 0.46% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, XJH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CGW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $372M |
| Since | 2007 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +27.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 16.49% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -25.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and XJH
Explore further