Screener
CGXU vs EPIN
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF vs Harbor International Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGXU costs 0.26% less per year.
- CGXU is significantly larger than EPIN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGXU follows a active selection strategy; EPIN uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGXU | EPIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.5B | $7M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.92% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.51% | — |
| Max drawdown | -25.64% | -11.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGXU and EPIN
Explore further