Screener
CGXU vs OSEA
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF vs Harbor International Compounders ETF
Key differences
- CGXU is significantly larger than OSEA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGXU follows a active selection strategy; OSEA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CGXU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGXU | OSEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.5B | $497M |
| Since | 2022 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.92% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.3% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.6% | +7.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.51% | 15.18% |
| Max drawdown | -25.64% | -18.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGXU and OSEA
Explore further