Screener
CGXU vs INEQ
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF vs Columbia International Equity Income ETF
Key differences
- INEQ costs 0.09% less per year.
- CGXU is significantly larger than INEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGXU follows a active selection strategy; INEQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, INEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- INEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGXU | INEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.5B | $80M |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.92% | 2.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.7% | +29.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.73% | 13.63% |
| Max drawdown | -25.64% | -40.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGXU and INEQ
Explore further