Screener
CGXU vs REFA
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGXU follows a active selection strategy; REFA uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGXU | REFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.5B | — |
| Since | 2022 | — |
| Dividend yield | 4.92% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.73% | — |
| Max drawdown | -25.64% | -11.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGXU and REFA
Explore further