Screener
CGXU vs PBD
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF vs Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- CGXU costs 0.21% less per year.
- CGXU is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGXU follows a active selection strategy; PBD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CGXU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGXU | PBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.5B | $208M |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.92% | 1.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +37.7% | +95.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.4% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.73% | 23.36% |
| Max drawdown | -25.64% | -75.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGXU and PBD
Explore further