Screener
PBD vs ICLN
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.36% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.3% | +78.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.23% | 25.99% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and ICLN
Explore further