Screener
CHAU vs HIBL
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- HIBL costs 0.21% less per year.
- CHAU covers emerging markets markets; HIBL covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, HIBL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHAU | HIBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $104M | $83M |
| Since | 2015 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.82% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +73.1% | +282.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.1% | +63.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.37 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 33.23% | 66.50% |
| Max drawdown | -78.58% | -88.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHAU and HIBL
Explore further