Screener
CHAU vs HIBS
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- HIBS costs 0.13% less per year.
- CHAU is significantly larger than HIBS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CHAU covers emerging markets markets; HIBS covers north america.
- CHAU follows a leveraged strategy; HIBS uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, CHAU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHAU | HIBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.19% | 1.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $104M | $19M |
| Since | 2015 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.82% | 7.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +73.1% | -82.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.1% | -63.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | -53.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.37 | -0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 33.23% | 67.94% |
| Max drawdown | -78.58% | -99.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHAU and HIBS
Explore further