Screener
CHIQ vs GXPD
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF vs Global X Purecap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF
Key differences
- GXPD costs 0.50% less per year.
- CHIQ is significantly larger than GXPD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CHIQ covers emerging markets markets; GXPD covers north america.
- CHIQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHIQ | GXPD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $148M | $36M |
| Since | 2009 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.59% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -16.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.13 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.72% | — |
| Max drawdown | -67.04% | -16.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHIQ and GXPD
Explore further