Screener
CHIQ vs IYC
Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF vs iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF
Key differences
- IYC costs 0.27% less per year.
- IYC is significantly larger than CHIQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CHIQ covers emerging markets markets; IYC covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, IYC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IYC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHIQ | IYC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $148M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2009 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.59% | 0.50% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -16.3% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.7% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.8% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.13 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.72% | 14.40% |
| Max drawdown | -67.04% | -35.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHIQ and IYC
Explore further