Screener
CHNL vs GBTC
Chainlink ETF vs Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
Key differences
- CHNL costs 0.35% less per year.
- GBTC is significantly larger than CHNL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GBTC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHNL | GBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.15% | 1.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $11.5B |
| Since | 2026 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | — |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -32.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +64.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 43.18% |
| Max drawdown | -12.72% | -89.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHNL and GBTC
Explore further