Screener
CHNL vs GLNK
Chainlink ETF vs Grayscale Chainlink Trust ETF
Key differences
- GLNK costs 1.15% less per year.
- GLNK is significantly larger than CHNL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GLNK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CHNL | GLNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.15% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $84M |
| Since | 2026 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | cryptocurrency |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | leveraged | — |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -50.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 110.20% |
| Max drawdown | -12.72% | -95.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CHNL and GLNK
Explore further