Screener
CLIX vs UWM
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF vs ProShares Ultra Russell2000
Key differences
Both CLIX and UWM are equity ETFs. CLIX charges 0.65% a year and UWM 0.95%. The main difference: CLIX follows a inverse strategy; UWM uses leveraged.
- CLIX follows a inverse strategy; UWM uses leveraged.
- CLIX costs 0.30% less per year.
- UWM is much larger than CLIX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, UWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- UWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLIX | UWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $249M |
| Since | 2017 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.5% | +73.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +26.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.8% | +1.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.01% | 38.76% |
| Max drawdown | -73.21% | -71.46% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.