Screener
UWM vs SRTY
ProShares Ultra Russell2000 vs ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000
Key differences
- UWM is significantly larger than SRTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UWM follows a leveraged strategy; SRTY uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, UWM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UWM | SRTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $248M | $81M |
| Since | 2007 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.83% | 8.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +91.3% | -69.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.5% | -47.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | -33.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | -0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 38.22% | 57.50% |
| Max drawdown | -71.46% | -99.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UWM and SRTY
Explore further