Screener
CLOA vs QLTA
iShares AAA CLO Active ETF vs iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- QLTA costs 0.05% less per year.
- CLOA follows a active selection strategy; QLTA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CLOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QLTA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOA | QLTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2023 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 5.09% | 4.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.8% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.57 | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.72% | 4.44% |
| Max drawdown | -1.34% | -22.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOA and QLTA
Explore further