Screener
QLTA vs HYBB
iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- QLTA costs 0.10% less per year.
- QLTA is significantly larger than HYBB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, HYBB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QLTA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QLTA | HYBB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $424M |
| Since | 2012 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 4.42% | 6.07% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.4% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.4% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.2% | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.45% | 3.32% |
| Max drawdown | -22.27% | -15.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QLTA and HYBB
Explore further