Screener
CLOA vs SLQD
iShares AAA CLO Active ETF vs iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SLQD costs 0.14% less per year.
- CLOA follows a active selection strategy; SLQD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CLOA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SLQD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOA | SLQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $2.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 5.09% | 4.25% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.8% | +5.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.57 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.72% | 1.49% |
| Max drawdown | -1.34% | -12.69% |
Similar to CLOA and SLQD
Explore further