Screener
CLOA vs IGIB
iShares AAA CLO Active ETF vs iShares 5-10 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- IGIB costs 0.16% less per year.
- IGIB is significantly larger than CLOA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CLOA follows a active selection strategy; IGIB uses index tracking.
- IGIB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOA | IGIB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $17.9B |
| Since | 2023 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 5.09% | 4.73% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.8% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 2.57 | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.72% | 4.20% |
| Max drawdown | -1.34% | -20.63% |
Similar to CLOA and IGIB
Explore further