Screener
CLOB vs EMBX
Vaneck Aa-bb Clo Etf vs VanEck Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- CLOB costs 0.31% less per year.
- CLOB follows a active selection strategy; EMBX uses index tracking.
- EMBX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CLOB | EMBX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.76% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $167M | $244M |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 6.55% | 5.51% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.03% | 5.86% |
| Max drawdown | -5.54% | -37.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CLOB and EMBX
Explore further